Blog Posts

Featured

Dr. Stella Immanuel touted hydroxychloroquine and now my video is banned!

https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2020/07/31/full-interview-houston-doctor-in-viral-video-touting-hydroxychloroquine-as-virus-cure-doubles-down-on-claims/

watch the full video here

Censorship

and then this from YouTube

Featured

The Written and Unwritten Common Law Constitution of England, Bound by Oath.

Two interpretations of the result of the Glorious Revolution 1688.

The British say that Parliament is Sovereign. Incorrect

The English say that the people are sovereign. Correct

The Glorious Revolution was an English Parliament it pre-dated the British Parliament. Therefore, the British Parliament is subverting the English Constitution.

English Law: 

English recorded law dates back thousands of years, ancient laws and Customs.  

The ancient Laws of Cambia, the Historical Triads of Britain.  

But Magna Carta 1215 is probably a good starting point for this overview.  The ancient laws and customs are still valid (as Her Majesty swore an oath to them).

The Bill of Rights and the Scottish Claim of Right of 1689, still part of statute law, are the sure foundation on which the whole edifice of Parliamentary democracy rests, and had great influence abroad, especially in the United States of America and in the Commonwealth.” Her Majesty the Queen 20 July 1988 Hansard vol 499 cc1301-3

https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1988/jul/20/her-majestys-reply

and of Course 21 July 1993, the Speaker of The House of Commons issued a reminder to the courts. Betty Boothroyd said: “There has of course been no amendment to The Bill of Rights . . . the House is entitled to expect that The Bill of Rights will be fully respected by all those appearing before the courts.”

I would suggest that anyone that says we do not have a Constitution reads the full speech by the Lord Privy Seal and Her Majesties response.

https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1988/jul/20/tercentenary-of-the-revolutions-of-1688

“By their acceptance of the Declaration of Rights, presented to them on the 13th of February 1689 in the Banqueting House in Whitehall, subsequently enacted by the Bill of Rights; and by their assent to the Claim of Right of Scotland, their late Majesties King William and Queen Mary concluded a solemn compact with their people; thereby were vindicated and asserted the ancient rights and liberties of the dutiful and loyal subjects of Your Majesty’s predecessors.

§“In consequence of this deliverance from arbitrary power and affirmation of the people’s rights, this nation has, since 1688, enjoyed security under a constitutional monarchy.” Lord Privy Seal.

The Magna Carta was a peace treaty between the Monarch and his subjects.  It predated Parliament and cannot be repealed by Parliament. Parliament did not exist in its current form until centuries later.  We had a roaming parliament travelling England similar to the legal system at the time.  i.e the court went to the area where it was needed rather than the defendants and representatives going to a central place.  We now have, The Old Bailey, The Royal Courts of Justice and the House of Lords is the court of last resort (the supreme court is unconstitutional and was brought about by a corrupt government and Houses of Parliament via the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, which should of gone to referendum or convention). 

Laws which are Constitutional often contain phases such as “In perpetuity “, “all time to come”,  “within this realm forever”, “forever”. 

Up until 1849 we had a similar system in place as the Americans.  i.e Separation of powers (but British trained lawyers and barristers would disagree).  BUT the Monarch stopped a key element of the “protections” that is of assent.  Some say, we are a republic of because of that legal situation.   In America that still exists as a power of “veto” (assent) by the President of the United States.  A subject to ask the monarch to veto a law made in the monarch’s parliament could use the petition (an ancient right reconfirmed {i.e it pre-existed}) in the declaration of rights and Bill of Rights 1688.  Contained in the Convention of 1688, the Declaration of Rights 1688 and the Bill of Rights 1688 was the right of the subject to petition the Monarch.   

They include Magna Carta (1215)

https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/magna-carta/british-library-magna-carta-1215-runnymede/

the Bill of Rights and Scottish Claim of Right (both 1689), 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2/introduction

Scottish Claim of Right 1689

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aosp/1689/28/contents

and the Treaty of Union (1706, enacted by both the English and Scottish parliaments), as well as the acts affecting union with Ireland. 

Scottish Act of Union 1706

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Ann/6/11/contents

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/apgb/Ann/6/40/contents

English Act of Union 1707

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aosp/1707/7/contents

The Instrument of Government, introduced by Oliver Cromwell in 1653

http://www.olivercromwell.org/protectorate/protectorate_7.htm

The Petition of Right 1628

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha1/3/1/contents

The Declaration of Rights 1688 * Formal Contract

This is the Declaration in Full, which King William and Queen Mary accepted. Offer + Acceptance = Contract in Law. Then it was converted via The Crown and Parliament Recognition Act 1688 into a Bill of Rights 1688/9 forever!

The Crown and Parliament Recognition Act 1688. 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMar/2/1/contents

The Bill of Rights 1688/9

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2/introduction

The Coronation Oath Act 1688 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMar/1/6/introduction

The Act of Settlement 1701

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Will3/12-13/2/introduction

The Act(s) of Union 1706/1707: The Act(s) of Union 1706/7

The British Parliament came into effect in 1707 preceded by The Acts of Union 1706/7.  It was these acts that gave rise to the “power of the British Parliament”.  The acts were clear.  This was not to be to the detriment of the English Laws or Scottish laws.  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aosp/1707/7/section/XXV

It is important to understand that the oath system binds our Constitution and to betray your oath, is very serious.  It is known as “perjuring ones oath” i.e breaching it.  This is on par with Treason.   Marxists, do not believe in God, therefore do not take the oath to God.  In general they affirm as non believers.    This is a Major issue. 

(pre existing English right) 

Bill of Rights 1688 (pre existed 1688 English right) 

Subjects’ Arms.

That the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as allowed by Law.

“The Subjects’.  Englishman

Protestants may have Arms for their Defence (this is clear)

suitable to their Conditions (what you can afford)

and as allowed by Law. (self defence laws and natural law of defence an unalienable right a God given right, this is contained within the discussions of the Convention and Declaration and Bill, it also pre existed these, so was a reconfirmation of that right, the British have removed it unlawfully by way of policy not law)”

England and Wales have a Common Law Constitution; Britain does not have a Constitution.  Britain contains two Countries within its geographical area, both of which have completely different legal systems.  England is Common Law Jurisdiction, Scotland is Roman Law.  

What is the difference? 

In England you can do what you like unless it is strictly forbidden in law.  The Law says what is forbidden.  In general; No Loss, No Harm, No Injury, No Fraud.  So as long as you have not caused any of the above, you have not committed an offence.  

In Scotland you can only do what is written in law.  Which is why the EU and European Nations have reams and reams of paper law.   Detailing the control of your life by lawmakers. 

What is Common Law: It is the interpretation of the Laws of the Land by Judges where the Acts of Parliament are unclear or unlawful, BUT no Act of Parliament, Monarch or Judge may contravene your rights as set out by the Constitution.

Parliament has not, and does not have the power to dismiss the Constitution – Erskine May, P3 13th Ed 1924 Ch. 1

The Succession to the Crown Act declares it High Treason for any one to maintain and affirm, by writing printing or preaching, “that the kings or queens of this realm, by and with the authority of Parliament, are not able to make laws and statutes of sufficient force and validity to limit and bind the crown, and the descent, limitation, inheritance, and government thereof,” Nor was this a modern principle of constitutional law, established, for the first time, by the revolution of 1688. If not admitted in its whole force so far back as the great charter of King John it has been affirmed by Parliament in very ancient times.

The English Legal System: Exam Cram 1952

Real Judges, Real Barristers, Real Solicitors, real peace constables were not indoctrinated by the British or UN ideologies. They were examined prior to the Bar and public duty on the Law.

Most police and legal professionals don’t know the basics. By design! Removed from Education system and Bar Exams in late 60’s early 70’s. I wonder why?

Featured

Letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

Unalienable Rights And The Securing Of Freedom, two week public comment period. Proclamation on Captive Nations Week, 2020


In my opinion your administration is a gift from God to the English.  At the G7 summit President Trump said to the British Press “What happened to England, no one mentions England anymore”. 

https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1964/jul/22/john-f-kennedy-memorial-bill

At Runnymede, Surrey,  England.  three acres of land was gifted to the USA Federal Government in 1965.  Their stands on USA sovereign land, a monument to President J F Kennedy.  On that monument is engraved the words 
“Let every nation know whether it wishes us well or ill that we shall pay any price bear any burden meet any hardship support any friend or oppose any foe in order to assure the survival and success of liberty” – from the inaugural address of President Kennedy 10 January 1961′

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eq_XZA2uPnnuZCyW7ClamP9iM8O5JyNUNGirKb19d-g/edit#:~:text=An%20Act%20to%20vest%20in,of%20the%20Kennedy%20Memorial%20Fund.

Your own website (State Department) at page Countries and areas does not show England, Scotland or Wales. Which further shows the deliberate attempt by the compiler of the list (The UN) to destroy England as the founder of U.S.A and its Constitution. 

England is a Country, it is part of a tyrannical Union, the British Union, UK.  Germany, Spain and the other Nations States in the EU (European Union) are listed on this page.  In comparison if you listed only the EU as a Nation (which it is not) those Nations would disappear.  So why are you doing that very thing to England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland?  The UK is a political union NOT a Country. The British is no more as a Nationality than North American is a Nationality.  North America is a geographical area which contains The USA (A Nation) and Canada (A Nation).  

The Great Seal
The United States of America

Letter Published:  

Dear Secretary of State, President Trump,  Unalienable Rights Commission, Dr. Peter Berkowitz  

England and the English vs the UK and the British, fundamental error!

I noted your speech on rights and the commissions report and bring your attention to Proclamation on Captive Nations Week, 2020.   Firstly you often conflate the English Nation with the British Union.  This is erroneous.  It is crucial you understand the difference between England as a Nation with a common law Constitution and the British Union, which has no Constitution. 

England was not tyrannous towards the New World (America).  If fact, the war of independence 1776 was because the English, Scots, Welsh and Irish (and other European Nationalities) now calling themselves Americans wanted the same RIGHTS as the English.  The British Union then attacked what is now known as the USA.  The British Union (not the English) attacked the USA again The War of 1812, then continued their attacks with Socialist, Marxist, Communist, Nazi allies in 2015 through to now (conspiring to subvert the USA Constitution).

It was the War of Independence  (1776) that started the attack on the English Common Law Constitution and the rights of the English Nation.  Contrary to the Act(s) of Union 1706 and 1707 and the English Bill of Rights 1688, Declaration of Rights 1688 and the Convention of 1688 all of which are the legal consequence of the Glorious Revolution.   The British Parliament started to undermine the English, Christian Constitution.    Whilst the Americans won, the English at home were and are persecuted and slowly relieved of the unalienable rights.  The English are truly the Prisoners of the Motherland! 

But yet still, academics, policy makers, lawyers refer wrongly to the British as your allies.  They are the snakes you invited in, and then they bit you and continue to bite you. 

I am an English Constitutionalist, persecuted by the British for standing in elections, fired from Jobs for believing in England and my unalienable rights, arrested outside Buckingham Palace for petitioning Her Majesty as encouraged to do so by my Bill Of Rights 1688.  Blacklisted from employment in the UK and savaged by the state.  

We, the English are ignored by America.  The English Common Law Constitution is the beating heart of the American Constitution.  If our Constitution dies, what happens to yours?

Remember, The British do not have a Constitution, Remember the British Union is not a Country, but it is a political union, no different in its nature from the USSR, the Yugoslavia Union and the European Union.  The EU had no Constitution, they tried that the people said NO.  They then renamed the European Union Constitution and called it the Lisbon Treaty.   The English people had no say.  The British finally had a Constitution.  Until the 31st December 2020.  Now is the time for America to speak of England, the English Common Law Constitution and the unalienable rights of the English, being denied those rights by the British Union.  Will you support an English Parliament? England is the only Country in Europe without its own parliament!  

I hope I have not bored you with the plight of an Englishman.  President Trump is the first President in my lifetime that I say, “President Trump is my President too”.  

Lastly, the Person that stopped slavery in the world of Common Law Jurisdiction was an Englishman, a Tailor from Durham, England.  A layperson in the law, that self educated himself (as I have).  He fought for the Black Slaves of the World; he went up against the British in English Courts when there were still English Judges none exist now, the English Constitution was removed from the Bar exams in the early 70’s, infiltration instead of invasion (Fabian Society). 

He won!  His name was Granville Sharp.  Look him up.

Yours Sincerely

 Graham Moore

A member of the English Democrat Party

Great Letter Adapted by a reader of this blog, all you need to do is send this to your MP as well and Lord Chief Justice.

ON NOTICE

3rd March 2021

Lord Reed

Baron Reed of Allermuir

The Supreme Court
Parliament Square
London
SW1P 3BD

My Lord,

Re: SARS-Cov2 coronavirus Covid 19 – Remedy IverMecTin

I have no doubt your gatekeepers will not allow you to see this email. None the less, you are on notice as complicit in genocide and here is why. Since 1992 IverMecTin has its Efficacy proven through clinical trials, for many viral diseases in the African continent and Ivermectin was approved in 1987 for Human consumption and as well as saving animal life. Furthermore, it is a harmless remedy that has proven success through further research studies and received a Nobel Prize and is listed as an essential medicine by the WHO (World Health Organisation). It is known to stop coronavirus (SARS-Cov2) (12mg in less than three days, most times within one day) and therefore stop hospitalizations. 12mg once a week with Zinc prevents Covid19.


In 29 years only 16 people have died through some association with IverMecTin. It is not been proven however, that the deaths were as a result of administering IverMectin in those 16 cases, as many factors such as age group, and other prescribed medication needed to have been considered. There were over 3.7 Billion doses administered and 16 potential deaths [in 29 years]. Now compare that to Covid19 Vaccines in less than one year *900 deaths. Watch the video presentation on the benefits the efficacy of IverMectin through the link below, by Dr Paul Marik professor of medicine, chief of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School, USA.


IverMecTin is safe and cheap (2p) a tablet. Why my Lord, are You allowing the British Government to murder English subjects for pharmaceutical profits (cartels)? By the way my Lord, IverMecTin has cancer suppressing and tumour reducing properties a potential huge loss in revenue to the cartels, do you know anyone who has died of cancer? Potential Cancer cure. IverMecTin is to Covid and Cancer as Vitamin C was for Scurvy. Scurvy killed millions. IverMectin must be made readily available through pharmacies and other licenced outlets throughout the United Kingdom, as with over-the-counter medicines like paracetamol or ibuprofen, for example.


Why are British regulations and laws stopping me from acquiring IverMecTin as a self-defence of my family and my own life? Do the English still have the right to self-determination? It is my body, and my choice. I am of sound mind; I want a virtually risk-free solution that covers a broad spectrum of viruses.

It is repugnant and perverse for British Government to immunize subjects of this land by implementing a ‘vaccination’ only programme (and not seeking to explore other remedies, natural or otherwise, that are available to the public), by issuing ‘health passports’ that goes against the consent of individuals. If those individuals who would not consent or comply, and their human right to do so, he or she held to ransom, it would seem. For example; employment, and the right to earn a living, the right to travel freely without hindrance, the right and the access to medical services that has been paid for by the tax payer. The right to protect and visit our families? This is clearly unlawful.

Why are you remaining silent my Lord? Why are you allowing the complicit Judges in lower courts to gate keep the peoples protests/petitions out of your court?

Why are you allowing the “undue influence” of the media and government, when in law the “omission” of IverMecTin and its benefits is not just a tort, it is now covered by the Fraud Act 2006. There is another term for it. Genocide. Mass Murder by the British State.


IverMecTin. Support Data;

Resources;https://ivmmeta.com;https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/

Yours sincerely

England CPAC

The fight back…

Contact CPAC USA contact@conservative.org and dschneider@conservative.org

Dear Sir/Madam

I am an English Constitutionalist and we are hated by the British Tories (Socialists), Labour Party (Socialists, Communists and Fascists) and Liberal Democrats (Fascists, Marxists) all British Parties.

I am not British but English and we have been suppressed by the British since 1825 because they lost America to the English Constitution and the war of 1812.  

We are true Conservatives unlike Nigel Farage who is the equivalent to Benedict Arnold, he is British not English. 

We the English need complete autonomy and our own Parliament.  We need to void the Acts of Union that the socialists (Tories) put in place to destroy the English Bill of Rights 1688, still valid. But ignored by the British Courts.
We need a full English CPAC and would like your permission to come on board.  i am also a member of the English Democrats (not like your democrats) and we want to host in England a CPAC event.

There are 37m of us waiting for the chance to strike back! We also have the right to keep and bear arms.  We have put it back on the political agenda. 
Kind Regards 

Letter to both Lord Chief Justice and Lord Reed President of the Supreme Court.

Head of all Courts England and wales: Lord Chief Justice email LCJ.office@judiciary.uk

The Royal Courts of Justice  Strand  London  WC2A 2LL 

https://members.parliament.uk/member/238/contact

and

https://members.parliament.uk/member/4875/career

Baron Reed of Allermuir (Lord Reed) enquiries@supremecourt.uk

The Supreme Court
Parliament Square
London
SW1P 3BD

You can also email both these Lords separately (put there title in the email subject) contactholmember@parliament.uk and copy the letter below.

My Lords,


I have no doubt your gatekeepers will not allow you to see this email. None the less you are on notice as complicit in genocide and here is why.


IverMecTin is harmless and received a Nobel Prize and is listed as an essential medicine by the WHO. It is known to stop Corona Virus (12mg in less than three days, most times within one day) and therefore stop hospitalizations. 12mg once a week with Zinc prevents Covid19.


In 29 years only 16 people have died through some association with IverMecTin, over 3.7 Billion doses administered and 16 potential deaths [in 29 years].


Now compare to Covid19 Vaccines in less than one year 900 deaths.


IverMecTin is safe and cheap (2p) a tablet. Why my Lords are you allowing the British Government to murder English subjects for pharmaceutical profits (cartels)?

By the way my Lords, IverMecTin has cancer suppressing and tumour reducing properties a potential huge loss in revenue to the cartels, do you know anyone who has died of cancer? Potential Cancer cure. IverMecTin is to Covid and Cancer as Vitamin C was for Scurvy. Scurvy killed millions.


Why are British regulations and laws stopping me from acquiring IverMecTin as a self defence of my family and my own life?

Do the English still have the right to self-determination?


It is my body, I am of sound mind, I want a virtually risk free solution that covers a broad spectrum of viruses.


Why are you allowing the complicit Judges in lower courts to gate keep the peoples protests out of your court?

Why are you allowing the “undue influence” of the media and government, when in law the “omission” of IverMecTin and its benefits is not just a tort, it is now covered by the Fraud Act 2006. There is another term for it. Genocide. Mass Murder by the British State.


IverMecTin.

Regards

Must watch Video: Dr Reiner Fuellmich CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY https://vimeo.com/498442220

Put your MP on notice and the Supreme Court. Here’s How.

watch the video only three minutes

Immunity Quad at work

Dear ________________MP IverMecTin is harmless and received a Nobel Prize and is listed as an essential medicine by the WHO. It is known to stop Corona Virus (12mg in less than three days, most times within one day) and therefore stop hospitalizations. 12mg once a week with Zinc prevents Covid19.

In 29 years only 16 people have died through some association with IverMecTin, over 3.7 Billion doses administered and 16 potential deaths [in 29 years]. Now compare to Covid19 Vaccines in less than 1 year 900 deaths. IverMecTin is safe and cheap (2p) a tablet.

Why _____________MP are you allowing the British Government to murder English subjects for pharmaceutical profits? By the way ____________MP, IverMecTin has cancer suppressing and tumour reducing properties. Potential Cancer cure. Like Vitamin C was for Scurvy.

Why are British regulations and laws stopping me from acquiring IverMecTin as a self defence of my family and my own life? Do the English still have the right to self-determination? It is my body, I am of sound mind, I want a virtually risk free solution that covers a wide spectrum of viruses. IverMecTin.

Regards

Ziverdo Kit (Kills Covid (flu) in two days)

Watch these two videos IverMecTin

and this one. The Villains and The Victims. Omission is mentioned here. It is part of the law of tort. English Common law damages. Guess what people, omission was imported into the new fraud act 2006. Omission (the withholding of knowledge) since 2006 is a criminal offence in England and Wales.

Then I will upload a third. This is even bigger than a pandemic. Think Potential harmless Cancer Cure!

It is IMPORTANT that you consider IverMecTin as a preventative measure against the the Viral effects of Covid19. I will put a link to the seller. https://www.rxpharmamedicine.com/product?id=M1hxUFRNOUZGQ0s4OC9WdzdjQklqdz09

Order your kits direct from here. Sunil Phalkehttps://www.rxpharmamedicine.com/product?id=SXhYZ1dMSE5EWnNwbVlhUCt6ZXltUT09

https://daddydragon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ziverdo-kit-500×500-1.jpeg

Three Parts to kit https://www.rxpharmamedicine.com/product?id=SXhYZ1dMSE5EWnNwbVlhUCt6ZXltUT09

Part A Zinc Acetate Tablets (Natural) 50mg 14 days supply

Part B Doxycycline capsules 100mg per capsule (2 per day) 5 days Supply

Part C Ivermectin 12mg (Natural) 3 days supply

Day 1, Take one zinc, two Doxycycline capsules, one Ivermectin tablet

Day 2 Take one zinc, two Doxycycline capsules, one Ivermectin tablet

Day 3 Take one zinc, two Doxycycline capsules, one Ivermectin tablet

Day 4 Take one zinc, two Doxycycline capsules

Day 5 Take one zinc, two Doxycycline capsules

Day 6 Take one zinc

Day 7 Take one zinc

Day 8 Take one zinc

Day 9 keep taking Zinc daily until finished…

Day 14 Take one zinc. Finished.

Important this is a treatment regime (if you feel like you have flu type symptoms) to keep you out of hospital and deals with the virus, chest infection and boosts immune system. As soon as you think you have flu start to take the regime asap, waiting allows the virus to inflame lungs and cause infection.

The above is not a preventative regime there is another regime for that. here

https://daddydragon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Dr-Zev-part-3.png

Here is a great site.

http://www.flccc.net/

Order you Ziverdo Kit from this guy Sunil Phalke. Here is the link! https://www.rxpharmamedicine.com/product?id=SXhYZ1dMSE5EWnNwbVlhUCt6ZXltUT09

Remember to do your own research and inform yourself of benefit vs risk. Whether you have allergies or reactions to certain drugs. I am not a Doctor and cannot advise you, nor do I. I am simply a researcher that sees far more than most.

It is my firm belief that YOU have the “unalienable right to defend yourself” and your family independently from Government.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11401060/anti-parasitic-drug-kill-coronavirus-two-days/

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ivermectin-tests-show-cheap-drug-may-reduce-covid-19-death-toll-zb27lx8wt

There is much much more
https://daddydragon.co.uk/2020/08/01/dr-stella-immanuel-touted-hydroxychloroquine-and-now-my-video-is-banned/

If you are on my newsletter list prior to 20th January 2021 email me for further explanation. I am not advising you on the condition you may have or not have, I am not advising you to take this medication. I am advising you to think for yourself and do your own due diligence.

You are not being given correct information by the Government or the Medical profession. You are not being given proper informed consent. Therefore do not consent. I will not take or accept in any way the Vaccine. I am exempt through previous serious illness.

Card Carrying Constitutionalists

This card is for unlawful, unconstitutional, Covid Regulations.

85mm x 55mm Back and Front of Card

https://daddydragon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bill-of-rights-front-.jpg

https://daddydragon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bill-of-Rights-1688-rear-of-card-ver2-.jpg

Here is a template for multiple cards, x 2 back and front:

Front of card multicard template
Rear of Cards